A federal appeals court has ruled that Harvard University did not intentionally discriminate against Asian American applicants in its admission process, dealing a blow to conservative attacks on universities who seek diversified student bodies, Politico reports.

In upholding the decision of the 1st District Court, the appeals court’s three-judge panel ruled that while race was a factor in determining admissions at the University,  it was a limited consideration and “is consistent with the requirements of Supreme Court precedent.”

Students For Fair Admissions, back by the Trump Department of Justice, claimed that Harvard had illegally discriminated against Asian Americans who had better test scores than others, particularly Black students, in the admission process.  The Trump Administration supported the lawsuit in an effort to overturn affirmative action practices. 

“Today’s decision once again finds that Harvard’s admissions policies are consistent with Supreme Court precedent, and lawfully and appropriately pursue Harvard’s efforts to create a diverse campus that promotes learning and encourages mutual respect and understanding in our community,” Harvard spokesperson Rachael Dane said. “As we have said time and time again, now is not the time to turn back the clock on diversity and opportunity.”

Judge Sandra Lynch, a Clinton appointee, wrote the ruling, which was decided by a 2-0 margin; Judge Juan Torruella, a Reagan appointee, abstained from voting on the decision.