The New York Times on Tuesday reported holy shit this is what we’re fucking paying them like $20 a month to print? Jesus Christ, in what universe is this a real article? They actually felt compelled to reduce this woman, who has probably at this point a better than 50-50 chance of becoming the leader of the free world, down to a study in fucking pantsuits? These people need help.
Fuck. Thing is that we would actually be more than cool with this if it were coming from some celebrity or fashion-centric outlet with a readership removed from politics like Us Weekly or Vogue or whatever. Get those people excited about Kamala Harris’s candidacy. A vote is still a vote even if it’s based on her looks and style being better than the Orange Diva’s. In the Times it just looks like frivolous, tiresome horseshit that piles on to the growing bad will among subscribers like us already beyond fed up with their fucking abysmal handling of this apocalyptic election year.