“On May 12, 2023, Special Counsel John H Durham submitted his Report on Matters Related to Intelligence Activities and Investigations Arising Out of the 2016 Presidential Campaigns (‘Durham Report’). Plaintiff and his lawyers tout the Report as ‘newly discovered evidence’ and they now ask me to reconsider my previous rulings. But far from ‘seismically alter[ing] the legal landscape of this case’, the Durham Report changes nothing. Nor could it really. Even if the Durham Report uncovered the sort of vast conspiracy alleged by Plaintiff (it plainly did not), it would not change the many legal conclusions I made in the Order dismissing Plaintiff’s lawsuit. And whatever the Durham Report can be said to have uncovered, for purposes of this case, it does not change my findings that Movants acted in bad faith in bringing this lawsuit and that this case exemplifies Mr Trump’s history of abusing the judicial process. Therefore, for the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff and his lawyers’ Motion for Indicative Ruling Based Upon New Evidence is denied,” writes Florida federal Judge Donald Middlebrooks in a ruling dismissing disgraced former President Trump’s attempt to wiggle out of sanctions Middlebrooks slapped him and his idiot lawyers with in the incredibly stupid Trump v Clinton et al 2016 election lawsuit that Middlebrooks tossed last year.