If you want a hint about how it went for convicted felon President Trump’s regime in a case brought by pro-Palestinian student visa holders targeted for deportation there’s the above screenshot of a postcard Massachusetts US District Judge William Young received from an anonymous fanboy. Or that after opening his 187-page ruling with that missive, Young then wrote “Proposed by Congress in 1789, and ratified in 1791, the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States – its words carved in New Hampshire granite on the exterior of the very courthouse in which this Court sits – provides: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Young then sorts out the case and then, at the bottom for 12 pages rips into the fat fuck’s personality disorders and then writes “Everything above in this section is necessary background to frame the problem this president has with the First Amendment. Where things run off the rails for him is his fixation with ‘retribution.’ ‘I am your retribution,’ he thundered famously while on the campaign trail. Yet government retribution for speech (precisely what has happened here) is directly forbidden by the First Amendment. The president’s palpable misunderstanding that the government simply cannot seek retribution for speech he disdains poses a great threat to Americans’ freedom of speech. It is at this juncture the judiciary has robustly rebuffed the president and his administration.”

So yeah, young ruled against him.