Republican Vice Presidential nominee JD Vance 3.1 had a very good debate. He was well-practiced, largely non-specific, and person-like. In fact, he was almost personable, with some points his opponent shared with his Democratic opponent, Tim Walz.
The problem is, we know Theilian Politician Model Vance 3.1 is a special model for the event. And we remember the previous models. The Vance 3.0 will be back on the campaign trail trying to make people forget the fallible Vance 2.0 that sucked up to right-wing nationalist groups–and honestly, the current model still leans that way–and certainly to erase any memory of the Vance 1, which referred to Trump as “America’s Hitler,” a “moral disaster,” and a “douchey celeb.”
Vance 3.1 reverted back to the 2.0 in refusing to say he would certify an election Republicans had lost even though state legislatures certified them. “Tim, I’m speaking of the future,” Vance said. “That is a damning non-answer,” Walz responded.