In what former Daily Beast reporter-turned-independent Substacker Roger Sollenberger writes is a “landmark revelation” that undermines the “White House’s protestations that Trump hasn’t been accused of wrongdoing,” Sollenberger says he’s connected the dots and found that an unidentified victim of now-deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was interviewed by the FBI in 2019, that documents in the Epstein files indicate she was deemed to be credible, and – most damningly – that her biographical details line up with that of the recipient of a 2021 settlement with Epstein’s estate.

“[REDACTED] stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit,” says the document on the encounter. “In response, Trump punched” the victim, who was “approximately 13-15 years old when this occurred” in the early-mid 1980s “in the head and kicked her out” of a room at a home somewhere in New Jersey.

The corroboration comes from public reporting on the 2021 case against the Epstein estate that the accuser, “Jane Doe 4,” as South Carolina native who was living in Vancouver, Washington as an adult when she called the FBI’s Epstein tip line in 2019. “The victimization occurred in the 1980’s when the caller was approximately 13 to 15 years old and resided in the [REDACTED] Island area of South Carolina,” the agents wrote in the July 2019 interview memo following Epstein’s second federal indictment but weeks before he was unalived in his cell before he could be brought to trial.

It gets even more damning: On the same slideshow where Jane Doe 4’s allegation was mentioned in an internal FBI slideshow presentation created last summer and included in the files, there’s mention of another woman who had claimed she was 14 when Epstein brought her to Mar-a-Lago in 1994 and said “This is a good one, right?” while showing her off to Trump – who agreed. This woman was a key prosecution witness in the government’s case against Ghislaine Maxwell, per Sollenberger.

Sayyyyy, Maurene Comey, in the unlikely event you’re reading this do you have any insight on that?