New Yorker: “In public, Republicans have denounced Democrats’ ambitious electoral-reform bill, the For the People Act, as an unpopular partisan ploy. But behind closed doors Republicans speak differently about the legislation, which is also known as House Resolution 1 and Senate Bill 1. They admit the lesser-known provisions in the bill that limit secret campaign spending are overwhelmingly popular across the political spectrum. In private, they concede their own polling shows that no message they can devise effectively counters the argument that billionaires should be prevented from buying elections. A recording obtained by The New Yorker of a private conference call on January 8th, between a policy adviser to Senator Mitch McConnell and the leaders of several prominent conservative groups – including one run by the Koch brothers’ network – reveals the participants’ worry that the proposed election reforms garner wide support not just from liberals but from conservative voters, too.”

“The speakers on the call expressed alarm at the broad popularity of the bill’s provision calling for more public disclosure about secret political donors. The participants conceded that the bill, which would stem the flow of dark money from such political donors as the billionaire oil magnate Charles Koch, was so popular that it wasn’t worth trying to mount a public-advocacy campaign to shift opinion. Instead, a senior Koch operative said that opponents would be better off ignoring the will of American voters and trying to kill the bill in Congress.”

“Kyle McKenzie, the research director for the Koch-run advocacy group Stand Together, told fellow-conservatives and Republican congressional staffers on the call that he had a ‘spoiler.’ ‘When presented with a very neutral description’ of the bill, ‘people were generally supportive,’ McKenzie said, adding that ‘the most worrisome part… is that conservatives were actually as supportive as the general public was when they read the neutral description.’ In fact, he warned, ‘there’s a large, very large, chunk of conservatives who are supportive of these types of efforts.’ As a result, McKenzie conceded, the legislation’s opponents would likely have to rely on Republicans in the Senate, where the bill is now under debate, to use ‘under-the-dome-type strategies’ – meaning legislative maneuvers beneath Congress’s roof, such as the filibuster – to stop the bill, because turning public opinion against it would be ‘incredibly difficult.'”